IAPP CIPP-US Prüfungsinformationen, CIPP-US Examengine

Ob Sie glauben oder nicht, bieten wir die autoritativen und wirkungsvollen Prüfungsunterlagen der IAPP CIPP-US. Wir sind sehr bereit, die beste Hilfe der IAPP CIPP-US Prüfungsvorbereitung Ihnen anzubieten. Vielleicht brauchen Sie nur die Zertifizierung der IAPP CIPP-US, um Ihren Wunsch des Aufstiegs zu erfüllen. Wir wissen, dass man leicht den Impulskauf bereuen, deshalb empfehlen wir Ihnen, zuerst zu probieren und dann zu kaufen. Die Demo der Prüfungsunterlagen der IAPP CIPP-US können Sie auf unserer Website einfach herunterladen. Probieren Sie mal!

Wir hoffen, dass sich alle Ihrer in der IAPP CIPP-US Prüfungssoftware gesetzten Erwartungen erfüllen können. Die Vollständigkeit und Autorität der Test-Bank, Vielfältigkeit der Versionen von Unterlagen---- Es gibt 3 Versionen, nämlich PDF, Online Test Engine und Practice Testing Engine, und auch die kostenlose Demo und einjährige Aktualisierung der IAPP CIPP-US Software, alles enthält unsere herzlichste Anstrengungen!

>> IAPP CIPP-US Prüfungsinformationen <<

CIPP-US Examengine & CIPP-US Quizfragen Und Antworten

ZertPruefung hat ein professionelles IT-Team, das sich mit der Forschung der Fragen und Antworten zur IAPP CIPP-US Zertifizierungsprüfung beschäftigt und Ihnen sehr effektive Prüfungsunterlagen und Online-Dienste bietet. Wenn Sie ZertPruefung Produkte kaufen, wird ZertPruefung Ihnen mit den neulich aktualisierten, sehr detaillierten Schulungsunterlagen von bester Qualität und genaue Prüfungsfragen und Antworten zur Verfügung stellen. So können Sie sich ganz unbesorgt auf Ihre IAPP CIPP-US Zertifizierungsprüfung vorbereiten. Benutzen Sie ganz beruhigt unsere ZertPruefung Produkte. Sie können 100% die CIPP-US Prüfung erfolgreich ablegen.

Die CIPP-US-Zertifizierungsprüfung wird von der International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP), einer gemeinnützigen Organisation, die sich der Förderung und Förderung von Datenschutzfachleuten weltweit einsetzt. Die IAPP ist die größte und umfassendste Community und Ressourcen für globale Information Privatsphäre und bietet Schulungen, Zertifizierungs- und Networking -Möglichkeiten für Datenschutzfachleute weltweit. Die CIPP-US-Zertifizierungsprüfung ist nur eines der vielen Zertifizierungsprogramme der IAPP, zu denen auch die CIPP/E (Europa), CIPP/Canada (Kanada) und CIPP/Asien-Zertifizierungsprogramme (Asien-Pazifik) gehören.

Die IAPP CIPP-US Prüfung ist eine Zertifizierungsprüfung, die das Wissen des Kandidaten über Datenschutzgesetze und -vorschriften in den USA testen soll. Die Prüfung wird von der International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) durchgeführt und gilt als Maßstab für Datenschutzexperten in den USA. Die Prüfung umfasst verschiedene Themen, einschließlich Datenschutzgesetze, Datensicherheit und Datenschutzmanagement.

IAPP Certified Information Privacy Professional/United States (CIPP/US) CIPP-US Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q212-Q217):

212. Frage
Which is an exception to the general prohibitions on telephone monitoring that exist under the
U.S.Wiretap Act?

A. Inter-company communications exception
B. Ordinary course of business exception
C. Internet calls exception
D. Call center exception

Antwort: B

Begründung:
The U.S. Wiretap Act prohibits the interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications, unless one of the statutory exceptions applies. One of these exceptions is the ordinary course of business exception, which allows an employer or service provider to intercept communications that are made in the ordinary course of its business, such as for quality control, training, or security purposes. This exception does not apply to communications that are not related to the business, such as personal calls or emails, or to communications that are intercepted for other reasons, such as harassment, discrimination, or retaliation. The scope and applicability of this exception may vary depending on the context, the consent of the parties, and the state law.

213. Frage
An organization self-certified under Privacy Shield must, upon request by an individual, do what?

A. Identify all personal information disclosed during a criminal investigation.
B. Provide the identities of third parties with whom the organization shares personal information.
C. Provide the identities of third and fourth parties that may potentially receive personal information.
D. Suspend the use of all personal information collected by the organization to fulfill its original purpose.

Antwort: B

Begründung:
Explanation/Reference: https://www.lakesidesoftware.com/sites/default/files/Privacy_Shield_Privacy_Statement.pdf

214. Frage
When may a financial institution share consumer information with non-affiliated third parties for marketing purposes?

A. After disclosing marketing practices to customers and after giving them an opportunity to opt out.
B. After disclosing information-sharing practices to customers and after giving them an opportunity to opt out.
C. After disclosing marketing practices to customers and after giving them an opportunity to opt in.
D. After disclosing information-sharing practices to customers and after giving them an opportunity to opt in.

Antwort: B

Begründung:
According to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) and its implementing Regulation P, a financial institution may share consumer information with non-affiliated third parties for marketing purposes only after disclosing its information-sharing practices to customers and after giving them an opportunity to opt out of such sharing. The GLBA defines a customer as a consumer who has a continuing relationship with a financial institution that provides one or more financial products or services to be used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes. A consumer is an individual who obtains or has obtained a financial product or service from a financial institution that is to be used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, or that individual's legal representative. A non-affiliated third party is any person except a financial institution's affiliate or a person employed jointly by a financial institution and a company that is not the financial institution's affiliate. An affiliate is any company that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another company.
The GLBA requires that a financial institution provide a privacy notice to customers: (i) at the time of establishing the customer relationship; (ii) annually during the continuation of the customer relationship; and (iii) before disclosing any nonpublic personal information (NPI) about the customer to any non-affiliated third party, unless an exception applies. The privacy notice must describe the categories of NPI that the financial institution collects and discloses; the categories of affiliates and non-affiliated third parties to whom the financial institution discloses NPI; the categories of NPI disclosed to service providers and joint marketers; the policies and practices with respect to protecting the confidentiality and security of NPI; and the disclosures of NPI to which the customer has a right to opt out. The financial institution must also provide a reasonable means for the customer to opt out of the disclosure of NPI to non-affiliated third parties, such as a check-off box, a reply form, or a toll-free telephone number. The opt-out notice must be clear and conspicuous, and must state that the customer can opt out at any time. The opt-out notice must also explain how the customer can opt out, and the effect of opting out. The financial institution must honor the customer's opt-out direction as soon as reasonably practicable after receiving it, and must not disclose any NPI to which the opt-out applies, unless an exception applies. The GLBA provides several exceptions to the opt-out requirement, such as when the disclosure of NPI is necessary to effect, administer, or enforce a transaction requested or authorized by the customer; when the disclosure of NPI is required or permitted by law; when the disclosure of NPI is to a consumer reporting agency in accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act; or when the disclosure of NPI is to a person that performs marketing services on behalf of the financial institution or on behalf of the financial institution and another financial institution under a joint marketing agreement. A joint marketing agreement is a formal written contract between a financial institution and any other person under which the parties agree to offer, endorse, or sponsor a financial product or service. The joint marketing agreement must prohibit the other person from using or disclosing the NPI for any purpose other than offering, endorsing, or sponsoring the financial product or service covered by the agreement.
The GLBA also requires that a financial institution provide a privacy notice to consumers who are not customers before disclosing any NPI about the consumer to any non-affiliated third party, unless an exception applies. The financial institution does not need to provide an opt-out notice to consumers who are not customers, unless it has a customer relationship with them. However, if the financial institution establishes a customer relationship with a consumer who was previously not a customer, it must provide a privacy notice and an opt-out notice to the customer as described above.

215. Frage
Most states with data breach notification laws indicate that notice to affected individuals must be sent in the
"most expeditious time possible without unreasonable delay." By contrast, which of the following states currently imposes a definite limit for notification to affected individuals?

A. New York
B. Maine
C. California
D. Florida

Antwort: D

Begründung:
Explanation/Reference: https://www.itgovernanceusa.com/data-breach-notification-laws

216. Frage
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION
When there was a data breach involving customer personal and financial information at a large retail store, the company's directors were shocked. However, Roberta, a privacy analyst at the company and a victim of identity theft herself, was not. Prior to the breach, she had been working on a privacy program report for the executives. How the company shared and handled data across its organization was a major concern. There were neither adequate rules about access to customer information nor procedures for purging and destroying outdated data. In her research, Roberta had discovered that even low- level employees had access to all of the company's customer data, including financial records, and that the company still had in its possession obsolete customer data going back to the 1980s.
Her report recommended three main reforms. First, permit access on an as-needs-to-know basis. This would mean restricting employees' access to customer information to data that was relevant to the work performed.
Second, create a highly secure database for storing customers' financial information (e.g., credit card and bank account numbers) separate from less sensitive information. Third, identify outdated customer information and then develop a process for securely disposing of it.
When the breach occurred, the company's executives called Roberta to a meeting where she presented the recommendations in her report. She explained that the company having a national customer base meant it would have to ensure that it complied with all relevant state breach notification laws. Thanks to Roberta's guidance, the company was able to notify customers quickly and within the specific timeframes set by state breach notification laws.
Soon after, the executives approved the changes to the privacy program that Roberta recommended in her report. The privacy program is far more effective now because of these changes and, also, because privacy and security are now considered the responsibility of every employee.
What could the company have done differently prior to the breach to reduce their risk?

A. Looked for any persistent threats to security that could compromise the company's network.
B. Communicated requests for changes to users' preferences across the organization and with third parties.
C. Implemented a comprehensive policy for accessing customer information.
D. Honored the promise of its privacy policy to acquire information by using an opt-in method.

Antwort: C

Begründung:
The scenario suggests that the company lacked adequate rules about access to customer information, which increased the risk of unauthorized access and data breach. Implementing a comprehensive policy for accessing customer information would have helped the company to limit the access to only those who need it for legitimate purposes, and to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the data. This is also one of the recommendations that Roberta made in her report. References:
* CIPP/US Practice Questions (Sample Questions), Question 116, Answer A, Explanation A.
* IAPP CIPP/US Certified Information Privacy Professional Study Guide, Chapter 5, Section 5.2, p. 143.

217. Frage
......

In dieser dynamischen Welt lohnt sich, etwas für berufliche Weiterentwicklung zu tun. Angesichts des Fachkräftemangels in vielen Branchen haben Sie mit einer IAPP CIPP-US (Certified Information Privacy Professional/United States (CIPP/US)) Zertifizierung mehr Kontrolle über Ihren eigenen Werdegang und damit bessere Aufstiegschancen.

CIPP-US Examengine: https://www.zertpruefung.ch/CIPP-US_exam.html

Joe Cook Joe Cook

Biography

IAPP CIPP-US Prüfungsinformationen, CIPP-US Examengine

CIPP-US Examengine & CIPP-US Quizfragen Und Antworten

IAPP Certified Information Privacy Professional/United States (CIPP/US) CIPP-US Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q212-Q217):

Join Our Community